5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE
5MVL.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and SBIM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - 5MVL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus while SBIM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 5MVL.DE returned 17.27%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for SBIM.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 5MVL.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SBIM.DE.
Performance
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5MVL.DE achieves a 45.83% return, which is significantly higher than SBIM.DE's 26.80% return.
5MVL.DE
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 46.38%
- 1Y
- 81.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SBIM.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 26.80%
- 6M
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 47.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5MVL.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 45.83% | 27.25% | 21.00% | 14.58% | -10.54% | 13.07% | 14.12% |
SBIM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF | 26.80% | 19.60% | 13.97% | 4.26% | -15.54% | 5.21% | 16.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5MVL.DE and SBIM.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between 5MVL.DE and SBIM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
5MVL.DE
SBIM.DE
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 5MVL.DE | SBIM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.48 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.86 | 4.37 | +4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.83 | 15.92 | +12.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 5MVL.DE | SBIM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31 | 2.68 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.47 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.69 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, which is greater than SBIM.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVL.DE and SBIM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5MVL.DE | SBIM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.25% | -26.22% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -11.10% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -19.55% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.60% | -24.52% | +3.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -2.43% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -10.36% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.05% | -0.18% |
Volatility
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Emerging ESG Broad CTB UCITS ETF (SBIM.DE) at 7.34%. This indicates that 5MVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBIM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5MVL.DE | SBIM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 7.34% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 15.35% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 18.09% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 16.67% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 16.63% | +2.21% |
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
5MVL.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
5MVL.DE vs. SBIM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5MVL.DE nor SBIM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, 5MVL.DE and SBIM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SBIM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBIM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.
5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while SBIM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Broad CTB Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 5MVL.DE and 0.20% for SBIM.DE.
Find the right allocation for 5MVL.DE and SBIM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer