PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5HEP.L is traded in GBp, while LCUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


5HEP.L

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
1.62%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5HEP.L
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
-0.99%-2.61%5.42%9.48%-6.21%23.62%19.82%26.14%-3.91%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%14.33%24.68%-6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HEP.L and LCUS.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.80

The correlation between 5HEP.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEP.L
5HEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HEP.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HEP.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

Drawdowns

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HEP.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

Volatility

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HEP.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HEP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HEP.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HEP.L nor LCUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5HEP.L
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


5HEP.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEP.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HEP.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HEP.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer