PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5HEP.L is traded in GBp, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HEP.L achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than HSUS.L's 14.52% return.


5HEP.L

1D
1.36%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
1.11%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
1.62%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*

HSUS.L

1D
0.49%
1M
8.65%
YTD
14.52%
6M
15.61%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
5HEP.L
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
-0.99%-2.61%5.42%9.48%-6.21%23.62%12.26%
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
14.52%10.79%21.83%15.09%-7.73%29.76%11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HEP.L and HSUS.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between 5HEP.L and HSUS.L has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEP.L
5HEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HSUS.L
HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HEP.LHSUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.64

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

6.41

-5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

22.69

-20.57

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HEP.L and HSUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HEP.LHSUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

3.49

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.03

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.09

-0.58

Drawdowns

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HEP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HEP.L and HSUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HEP.LHSUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.16%

-20.92%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-5.63%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-20.92%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-20.92%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

0.00%

-8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-3.18%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.59%

+1.50%

Volatility

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that 5HEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HEP.LHSUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.97%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

7.46%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

10.36%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.77%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

14.20%

+1.82%

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HEP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HEP.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HEP.L nor HSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5HEP.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEP.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HEP.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HEP.L and HSUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer