PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Eurozone PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP2E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HEE.DE achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than OP2E.DE's 6.95% return.


5HEE.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*

OP2E.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
3.64%
YTD
6.95%
6M
8.04%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
5HEE.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)
-0.31%-7.39%10.30%11.99%-14.41%
OP2E.DE
Ossiam Bloomberg Eurozone PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR)
6.95%15.46%7.37%19.25%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

0.53

The correlation between 5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEE.DE
5HEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
5HEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
5HEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

OP2E.DE
OP2E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
OP2E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OP2E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OP2E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
OP2E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OP2E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) and Ossiam Bloomberg Eurozone PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP2E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HEE.DEOP2E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.08

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

3.64

-2.38

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the OP2E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HEE.DEOP2E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.86

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.86

-0.35

Drawdowns

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than OP2E.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HEE.DEOP2E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-16.56%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-11.92%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.48%

-16.56%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.85%

-0.25%

-11.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-2.85%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

3.53%

-0.73%

Volatility

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE) is 3.31%, while Ossiam Bloomberg Eurozone PAB NR UCITS ETF (EUR) (OP2E.DE) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that 5HEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OP2E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HEE.DEOP2E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.94%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.54%

12.42%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

14.98%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

15.18%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

15.18%

+1.72%

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HEE.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OP2E.DE's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HEE.DE vs. OP2E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HEE.DE nor OP2E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OP2E.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OP2E.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEE.DE.

5HEE.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OP2E.DE is Europe Equities. 5HEE.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector, while OP2E.DE tracks Bloomberg PAB Eurozone DM Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HEE.DE and 0.17% for OP2E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HEE.DE and OP2E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer