PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HED.L vs. BBUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HED.L achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS.L's 9.93% return.


5HED.L

1D
0.61%
1M
1.51%
6M
0.20%
YTD
2.40%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*

BBUS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.10%
6M
9.55%
YTD
9.93%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
5HED.L
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
2.40%4.27%3.80%15.96%-16.20%22.01%24.02%14.63%
BBUS.L
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc
9.93%17.54%24.98%27.64%-19.96%27.64%20.13%13.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HED.L and BBUS.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between 5HED.L and BBUS.L has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HED.L
5HED.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
5HED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
5HED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.L
BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5HED.LBBUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.43

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

9.88

-7.57

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HED.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HED.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HED.L drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HED.L and BBUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HED.LBBUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.84%

-34.26%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.62%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-19.36%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.17%

-25.33%

+3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-0.64%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-5.30%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.13%

+1.46%

Volatility

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.L) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) at 2.99%. This indicates that 5HED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HED.LBBUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

2.99%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

9.42%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

12.14%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.20%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

17.73%

+0.53%

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HED.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HED.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HED.L nor BBUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5HED.L and BBUS.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.L.

They also come from different issuers: Ossiam and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HED.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HED.L and BBUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer