PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5ESG.L vs. UD08.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5ESG.L achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than UD08.L's 18.69% return.


5ESG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
8.03%
6M
8.05%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*

UD08.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
18.69%
6M
18.55%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
8.03%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%31.59%15.83%16.65%
UD08.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
18.69%18.86%6.39%-6.29%12.33%33.73%-3.77%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between 5ESG.L and UD08.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between 5ESG.L and UD08.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

UD08.L
UD08.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UD08.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD08.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD08.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UD08.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD08.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5ESG.LUD08.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

4.53

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

14.12

-1.89

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the UD08.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5ESG.L and UD08.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5ESG.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum UD08.L drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESG.L and UD08.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5ESG.LUD08.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-40.62%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-6.43%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-13.21%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-24.66%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-6.16%

+4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-12.22%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.99%

+0.10%

Volatility

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5ESG.LUD08.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.03%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

12.00%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

14.30%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.18%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.11%

+0.94%

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5ESG.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UD08.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

5ESG.L vs. UD08.L - Dividend Comparison

5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while UD08.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.63%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
UD08.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


5ESG.L and UD08.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD08.L.

5ESG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UD08.L is Commodities. 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while UD08.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.17% for 5ESG.L and 0.34% for UD08.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5ESG.L and UD08.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer