5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) and CHTE.L (UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 5ESG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while CHTE.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5ESG.L returned 21.08%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for CHTE.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 5ESG.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for CHTE.L.

Performance

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CHTE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5ESG.L achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than CHTE.L's -6.46% return.

5ESG.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 10.78%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

CHTE.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 6M: -9.87%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	9.48%	18.26%	23.62%	26.17%	-16.83%
CHTE.L UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	-6.46%	32.47%	12.40%	-15.02%	-21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between 5ESG.L and CHTE.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2022	0.25

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	5ESG.L	CHTE.L
Technology	38.6%	32.1%
Communication Services	14.5%	21.8%
Financial Services	12.0%	0.6%
Healthcare	9.3%	12.0%
Industrials	6.8%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	28.7%
Energy	4.2%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5ESG.L

5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CHTE.L

CHTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
CHTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CHTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CHTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CHTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CHTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CHTE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	5ESG.L	CHTE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	0.14	+2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	0.37	+3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.04	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	0.13	+3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.65	0.22	+14.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the CHTE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5ESG.L and CHTE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5ESG.L	CHTE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	0.14	+2.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	-0.05	+1.09

Drawdowns

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5ESG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, smaller than the maximum CHTE.L drawdown of -45.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESG.L and CHTE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	5ESG.L	CHTE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.50%	-45.52%	+14.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-26.34%	+17.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-31.31%	+11.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-23.37%	+23.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-23.18%	+17.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	15.05%	-13.00%

Volatility

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) is 3.46%, while UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CHTE.L) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that 5ESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHTE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	5ESG.L	CHTE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	9.78%	-6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	17.24%	-8.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	24.38%	-12.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	38.54%	-22.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	38.54%	-19.41%

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5ESG.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CHTE.L's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

5ESG.L vs. CHTE.L - Dividend Comparison

5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while CHTE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist	0.62%	0.87%	0.47%	1.07%	1.32%	0.89%	1.25%	0.39%
CHTE.L UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 5ESG.L and CHTE.L in my portfolio?

5ESG.L and CHTE.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 5ESG.L or CHTE.L?

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 5ESG.L or CHTE.L?

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CHTE.L.

What is the main difference between 5ESG.L and CHTE.L?

5ESG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while CHTE.L is Technology Equities. 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while CHTE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for 5ESG.L and 0.47% for CHTE.L.