PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE) and Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5ESG.DE achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than SC0Z.DE's 16.58% return.


5ESG.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.86%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.69%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*

SC0Z.DE

1D
1.86%
1M
0.30%
YTD
16.58%
6M
17.47%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
5ESG.DE
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
12.10%5.31%31.42%24.26%-13.76%43.86%33.71%
SC0Z.DE
Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
16.58%32.73%0.20%13.45%-9.07%8.96%36.82%

Correlation

The correlation between 5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2020

0.32

The correlation between 5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5ESG.DE
5ESG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
5ESG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0Z.DE
SC0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SC0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE) and Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5ESG.DESC0Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

3.80

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.11

9.64

+6.47

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5ESG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SC0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5ESG.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum SC0Z.DE drawdown of -33.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5ESG.DESC0Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-33.41%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.46%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.40%

-13.65%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

-23.25%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-2.29%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-8.20%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.95%

-1.14%

Volatility

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE) and Invesco European Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Z.DE) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5ESG.DESC0Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.25%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

13.08%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

15.01%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

16.22%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.83%

-0.05%

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5ESG.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0Z.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

5ESG.DE vs. SC0Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5ESG.DE nor SC0Z.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0Z.DE.

5ESG.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while SC0Z.DE is Utilities Equities. 5ESG.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SC0Z.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Utilities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for 5ESG.DE and 0.20% for SC0Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5ESG.DE and SC0Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer