5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
5ESE.DE (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF EUR Hdg Acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - 5ESE.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index while 4UBQ.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5ESE.DE returned 17.55%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 5ESE.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5ESE.DE achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBQ.DE's 12.19% return.
5ESE.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESE.DE Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF EUR Hdg Acc | 7.92% | 15.84% | 21.80% | 24.91% | -21.16% | 2.35% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.19% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5ESE.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between 5ESE.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
5ESE.DE
4UBQ.DE
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF EUR Hdg Acc (5ESE.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 5ESE.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 3.88 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 14.86 | -5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5ESE.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESE.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5ESE.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -23.35% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -6.93% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -23.35% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.90% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -3.95% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.81% | +0.37% |
Volatility
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF EUR Hdg Acc (5ESE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 3.49%. This indicates that 5ESE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5ESE.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.49% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 8.11% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 11.93% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 15.33% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 15.46% | +1.16% |
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
5ESE.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
5ESE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5ESE.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
5ESE.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 5ESE.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5ESE.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
5ESE.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for 5ESE.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for 5ESE.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer