PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 540J.DE achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with 540J.DE having a 8.74% annualized return and IBCJ.DE not far ahead at 9.17%.


540J.DE

1D
1.16%
1M
0.54%
YTD
4.11%
6M
7.57%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.74%

IBCJ.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
1.95%
YTD
16.30%
6M
26.50%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
29.89%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
540J.DE
Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR
4.11%18.35%3.72%10.70%-12.88%29.27%1.18%35.15%-4.77%7.46%
IBCJ.DE
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.30%53.66%-0.42%43.86%-21.74%14.34%-18.69%-3.73%-9.07%35.59%

Correlation

The correlation between 540J.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

540J.DE
540J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
540J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
540J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
540J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
540J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
540J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCJ.DE
IBCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IBCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


540J.DEIBCJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.90

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

9.60

-6.00

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 540J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the IBCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 540J.DE and IBCJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


540J.DEIBCJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.65

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.55

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.36

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.15

+0.49

Drawdowns

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 540J.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 540J.DE and IBCJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


540J.DEIBCJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-56.11%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-9.96%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-18.47%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-47.31%

+29.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.99%

-56.11%

+30.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-1.16%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-19.38%

+13.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

4.05%

-0.53%

Volatility

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) is 4.33%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that 540J.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


540J.DEIBCJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

7.13%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

17.61%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

23.48%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

26.72%

-13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

25.15%

-11.12%

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

540J.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

540J.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 540J.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


540J.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 540J.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

540J.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.

540J.DE tracks MSCI Switzerland, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for 540J.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 540J.DE and IBCJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer