500U.L vs. SPXS.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SPXS.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 500U.L returned 12.87%/yr vs -55.04%/yr for SPXS.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. 500U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXS.L.

Performance

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 500U.L having a 9.03% return and SPXS.L slightly lower at 8.95%.

500U.L

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 8.07%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: —

SPXS.L

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 8.00%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 1Y: -98.80%
• 3Y*: -74.24%
• 5Y*: -55.04%
• 10Y*: -27.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	9.03%	17.42%	25.42%	26.85%	-18.63%	29.68%	17.93%	31.98%	-2.14%
SPXS.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	8.95%	-98.82%	25.56%	27.00%	-18.53%	29.64%	17.89%	30.86%	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between 500U.L and SPXS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2018	0.97

The correlation between 500U.L and SPXS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

500U.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500U.L

500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

SPXS.L

SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	500U.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	-0.99	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	-0.80	+3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.51	+0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	-1.00	+3.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	-1.22	+11.04

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500U.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500U.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and SPXS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	500U.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.04%	-99.07%	+65.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-99.07%	+90.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.29%	-99.07%	+80.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-99.07%	+74.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-98.91%	+97.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-7.69%	+2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	80.82%	-78.78%

Volatility

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L) at 3.01%. This indicates that 500U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	500U.L	SPXS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	3.01%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	9.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	99.43%	-87.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	47.12%	-31.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	35.28%	-18.16%

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

500U.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 500U.L nor SPXS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 500U.L and SPXS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, 500U.L and SPXS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, 500U.L or SPXS.L?

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 500U.L or SPXS.L?

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

What is the main difference between 500U.L and SPXS.L?

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500U.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.