500U.L vs. IUES.L
500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L returned 15.69%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500U.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L has outperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of 15.69%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500U.L and IUES.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.33 |
The correlation between 500U.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
500U.L
IUES.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
500U.L
IUES.L
Utilities
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
500U.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500U.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
500U.L
IUES.L
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500U.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.18 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 9.97 | +4.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500U.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.12 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.76 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 0.32 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.31 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500U.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -66.78% | +32.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -14.49% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.29% | -20.90% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -27.98% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -66.78% | +32.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -7.45% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -14.21% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 4.63% | -2.72% |
Volatility
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) is 3.21%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that 500U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500U.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 8.13% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 18.58% | -10.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 21.81% | -10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 26.72% | -10.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 28.49% | -10.23% |
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 500U.L and IUES.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
500U.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500U.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
500U.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500U.L and IUES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
500U.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for 500U.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer