500U.L vs. ANXU.L
500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L returned 15.69%/yr vs 21.70%/yr for ANXU.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 500U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.
Performance
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500U.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 15.69%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.70% annualized return.
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 39.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 27.83% | 47.17% | 40.88% | -1.76% | 32.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500U.L and ANXU.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, 500U.L and ANXU.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
500U.L
ANXU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
500U.L
ANXU.L
Financial Services
500U.L
ANXU.L
Communication Services
500U.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Cyclical
500U.L
ANXU.L
Healthcare
500U.L
ANXU.L
Industrials
500U.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Defensive
500U.L
ANXU.L
Energy
500U.L
ANXU.L
Utilities
500U.L
ANXU.L
Real Estate
500U.L
ANXU.L
Basic Materials
500U.L
ANXU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500U.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
500U.L
ANXU.L
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500U.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.66 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 13.14 | +1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500U.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.54 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.86 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and ANXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500U.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -35.13% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -11.01% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.29% | -22.45% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -35.13% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -35.13% | +1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.77% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -5.77% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 3.08% | -1.17% |
Volatility
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) is 3.21%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that 500U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500U.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 5.03% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 11.93% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 15.91% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 20.79% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 21.15% | -2.89% |
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
500U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
500U.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500U.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, 500U.L and ANXU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.
500U.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500U.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.
Find the right allocation for 500U.L and ANXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer