500P.L vs. MVUS.L
500P.L (Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF) and MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - 500P.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG Index while MVUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 500P.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for MVUS.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 500P.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MVUS.L.
Performance
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
500P.L is traded in GBP, while MVUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MVUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500P.L achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than MVUS.L's 4.45% return.
500P.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
MVUS.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 12.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500P.L Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF | 8.20% | 7.74% | 28.94% | 23.30% | -12.86% | 34.04% | 11.40% |
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.45% | 3.88% | 20.71% | 3.83% | -0.36% | 26.59% | 5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500P.L and MVUS.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between 500P.L and MVUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500P.L vs. MVUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
500P.L
MVUS.L
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (500P.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500P.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.32 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 7.24 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500P.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.55 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.86 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.95 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500P.L drawdown since its inception was -20.32%, smaller than the maximum MVUS.L drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500P.L and MVUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500P.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.32% | -24.85% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.81% | -5.39% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.32% | -14.19% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.32% | -14.19% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -3.44% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.73% | +1.75% |
Volatility
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (500P.L) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) at 2.24%. This indicates that 500P.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500P.L | MVUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.24% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 5.65% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 8.05% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 11.72% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 13.78% | +1.29% |
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
500P.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MVUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
500P.L vs. MVUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500P.L nor MVUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
500P.L and MVUS.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 500P.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500P.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.
500P.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG Index, while MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for 500P.L and 0.20% for MVUS.L.
Find the right allocation for 500P.L and MVUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer