PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4UBQ.DE achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than UEFS.DE's 3.71% return.


4UBQ.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
4.20%
YTD
11.15%
6M
11.13%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*

UEFS.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.91%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.67%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.15%5.39%31.02%24.03%-13.92%43.62%8.66%
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
3.71%2.37%13.84%8.28%-14.67%5.66%-1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020

0.43

The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (5 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBQ.DE
4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UEFS.DE
UEFS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4UBQ.DEUEFS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.96

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.73

12.59

+3.14

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4UBQ.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.98

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.38

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.44

+0.67

Drawdowns

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, roughly equal to the maximum UEFS.DE drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4UBQ.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-24.26%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-2.87%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.35%

-13.70%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-17.84%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-7.41%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

0.91%

+0.90%

Volatility

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) at 1.27%. This indicates that 4UBQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEFS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4UBQ.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

1.27%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

3.77%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

5.76%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

8.69%

+6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

9.37%

+6.02%

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4UBQ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UEFS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4UBQ.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Dividend Comparison

4UBQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEFS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
6.50%7.96%6.14%6.46%6.08%4.22%5.09%4.60%4.53%4.90%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UEFS.DE.

4UBQ.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while UEFS.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE and 0.25% for UEFS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4UBQ.DE and UEFS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer