4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) and AW1T.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG, while AW1T.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 4UBQ.DE returned 18.50%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for AW1T.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4UBQ.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AW1T.DE.

Performance

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4UBQ.DE achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than AW1T.DE's 7.24% return.

4UBQ.DE

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 15.51%
• 10Y*: —

AW1T.DE

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: 10.70%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 20.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	11.15%	5.39%	31.02%	24.03%	-14.02%
AW1T.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc	7.24%	37.16%	9.32%	18.73%	7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022	0.44

Return for Risk

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBQ.DE

4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AW1T.DE

AW1T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 48
AW1T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AW1T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AW1T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
AW1T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
AW1T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	4UBQ.DE	AW1T.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.65	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.28	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.30	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	2.42	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.73	8.19	+7.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the AW1T.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	4UBQ.DE	AW1T.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.65	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	1.50	-0.39

Drawdowns

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, which is greater than AW1T.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	4UBQ.DE	AW1T.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.35%	-14.81%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-8.88%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.35%	-14.81%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.45%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-2.14%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.63%	-0.82%

Volatility

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) is 2.81%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (AW1T.DE) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that 4UBQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AW1T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	4UBQ.DE	AW1T.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	3.45%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	10.46%	-2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.53%	13.06%	-1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	13.79%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	13.79%	+1.60%

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4UBQ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AW1T.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

4UBQ.DE vs. AW1T.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4UBQ.DE nor AW1T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE in my portfolio?

4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 4UBQ.DE or AW1T.DE?

On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 4UBQ.DE or AW1T.DE?

4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AW1T.DE.

What is the main difference between 4UBQ.DE and AW1T.DE?

4UBQ.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while AW1T.DE is Europe Equities. 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while AW1T.DE tracks MSCI EMU Value. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE and 0.25% for AW1T.DE.