PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 4UBF.DE having a 0.73% return and QDVL.DE slightly higher at 0.74%.


4UBF.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.31%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.74%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.73%3.23%4.51%8.22%-15.67%-0.28%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-3.63%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between 4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021

0.62

The correlation between 4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4UBF.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.08

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

8.99

-6.69

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4UBF.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.65

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.01

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.32

-0.36

Drawdowns

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4UBF.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-8.22%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-0.93%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.88%

-0.93%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.99%

-4.90%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-0.01%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-0.71%

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.22%

+0.65%

Volatility

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that 4UBF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4UBF.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.34%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

1.02%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

1.18%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

1.58%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

2.86%

+2.16%

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4UBF.DE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4UBF.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

4UBF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.

4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for 4UBF.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4UBF.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer