PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4MMR.DE vs. KDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

4MMR.DE is traded in EUR, while KDEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KDEF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4MMR.DE achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly lower than KDEF's 30.94% return.


4MMR.DE

1D
4.32%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
14.51%
6M
7.98%
1Y
47.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KDEF

1D
7.20%
1M
-9.82%
YTD
30.94%
6M
20.63%
1Y
116.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4MMR.DE
4MMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
4MMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4MMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
4MMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
4MMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
4MMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

KDEF
KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4MMR.DEKDEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

2.67

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

3.11

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

5.76

-2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.83

15.88

-6.04

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4MMR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the KDEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4MMR.DE and KDEF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4MMR.DEKDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.67

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.38

2.76

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between 4MMR.DE and KDEF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Dividend Comparison

4MMR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.


Drawdowns

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4MMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum KDEF drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4MMR.DE and KDEF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


4MMR.DEKDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-22.51%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-22.51%

+9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-12.41%

+7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-5.85%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

8.11%

-3.13%

Volatility

4MMR.DE vs. KDEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) is 7.80%, while PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a volatility of 20.00%. This indicates that 4MMR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


4MMR.DEKDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

20.00%

-12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

33.51%

-16.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.63%

43.95%

-19.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

44.87%

-20.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.84%

44.87%

-20.03%