3TSM.L vs. DES2.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) and DES2.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 3TSM.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index, while DES2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3TSM.L returned 124.98%/yr vs -24.00%/yr for DES2.L. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. 3TSM.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DES2.L.

Performance

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3TSM.L is traded in USD, while DES2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DES2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSM.L achieves a 82.42% return, which is significantly higher than DES2.L's -7.88% return.

3TSM.L

• 1D: -4.38%
• 1M: -20.71%
• 6M: 45.07%
• YTD: 82.42%
• 1Y: 204.09%
• 3Y*: 124.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DES2.L

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: -7.88%
• 1Y: -10.70%
• 3Y*: -24.00%
• 5Y*: -20.76%
• 10Y*: -23.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities	82.42%	60.55%	288.94%	90.51%	-85.22%	0.71%
DES2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-7.88%	-27.59%	-29.84%	-26.03%	1.35%	-3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSM.L and DES2.L is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	-0.43

Return for Risk

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSM.L

3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

DES2.L

DES2.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
DES2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
DES2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
DES2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
DES2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
DES2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3TSM.L	DES2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	-0.33	+2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	-0.27	+2.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.97	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	-0.40	+4.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	-0.88	+12.65

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the DES2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3TSM.L and DES2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, smaller than the maximum DES2.L drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSM.L and DES2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3TSM.L	DES2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-99.65%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.56%	-26.68%	-19.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.95%	-64.39%	-17.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-93.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.12%	-99.63%	+65.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.53%	-88.43%	+36.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.26%	12.13%	+5.13%

Volatility

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) has a higher volatility of 44.79% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) at 9.17%. This indicates that 3TSM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DES2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3TSM.L	DES2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.79%	9.17%	+35.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.00%	26.51%	+61.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	112.74%	32.21%	+80.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.91%	33.30%	+88.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.91%	36.16%	+85.75%

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3TSM.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DES2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

3TSM.L vs. DES2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3TSM.L nor DES2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3TSM.L and DES2.L in my portfolio?

3TSM.L and DES2.L have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3TSM.L or DES2.L?

On fees, DES2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3TSM.L or DES2.L?

DES2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSM.L.

What is the main difference between 3TSM.L and DES2.L?

3TSM.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DES2.L is Inverse Equities. 3TSM.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index, while DES2.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3TSM.L and 0.60% for DES2.L.