PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3TSE.L is traded in EUR, while AVGI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSE.L achieves a -57.96% return, which is significantly lower than AVGI.L's 13.59% return.


3TSE.L

1D
-5.61%
1M
-38.56%
YTD
-57.96%
6M
-65.51%
1Y
-26.08%
3Y*
-52.82%
5Y*
-58.61%
10Y*

AVGI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
13.59%
6M
14.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
3TSE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR
-57.96%112.14%
AVGI.L
IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP
13.59%11,401.72%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSE.L and AVGI.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSE.L
3TSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
3TSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGI.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3TSE.LAVGI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than AVGI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSE.L and AVGI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3TSE.LAVGI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-43.90%

-55.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-26.49%

-73.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-22.48%

-64.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.25%

Volatility

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3TSE.LAVGI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.09%

10,072.85%

-9,942.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.70%

10,072.85%

-9,905.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.26%

10,072.85%

-9,906.59%

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3TSE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3TSE.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison

3TSE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.40%.


Frequently Asked Questions


3TSE.L and AVGI.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSE.L.

3TSE.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVGI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3TSE.L and 0.55% for AVGI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3TSE.L and AVGI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer