PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3TSE.L is traded in EUR, while 3QQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3QQQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSE.L achieves a -34.04% return, which is significantly lower than 3QQQ.L's 60.25% return.


3TSE.L

1D
5.89%
1M
25.77%
YTD
-34.04%
6M
-30.13%
1Y
-22.56%
3Y*
-39.32%
5Y*
-50.93%
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
34.83%
YTD
60.25%
6M
53.70%
1Y
121.74%
3Y*
54.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3TSE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR
-34.04%-73.03%31.43%225.06%-93.87%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
60.25%0.38%71.54%178.60%-56.70%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.52

The correlation between 3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSE.L
3TSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
3TSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3TSE.L3QQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.39

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

2.57

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

5.34

-5.94

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3TSE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3TSE.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.92

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.56

-0.89

Drawdowns

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than 3QQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3TSE.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-59.90%

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.98%

-47.13%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.43%

-59.90%

-35.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.64%

-0.01%

-99.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.75%

-21.31%

-64.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.45%

22.72%

+14.73%

Volatility

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) has a higher volatility of 38.69% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) at 13.98%. This indicates that 3TSE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3TSE.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.69%

13.98%

+24.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.97%

33.15%

+51.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.69%

63.30%

+75.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.13%

63.20%

+102.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

165.46%

63.20%

+102.26%

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3TSE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

3TSE.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3TSE.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSE.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3TSE.L and 0.01% for 3QQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3TSE.L and 3QQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer