PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3QQQ.L achieves a 55.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ5.L's 91.93% return.


3QQQ.L

1D
-1.99%
1M
26.97%
YTD
55.20%
6M
49.56%
1Y
119.94%
3Y*
56.07%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ5.L

1D
-3.75%
1M
44.54%
YTD
91.93%
6M
81.30%
1Y
210.48%
3Y*
74.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
55.20%13.90%60.92%187.21%-56.66%
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
91.93%2.29%74.04%430.61%-75.24%

Correlation

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.94

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ5.L
QQQ5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3QQQ.LQQQ5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.68

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

10.11

-4.79

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3QQQ.LQQQ5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.62

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-0.04

+0.62

Drawdowns

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ5.L drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3QQQ.LQQQ5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.93%

-96.40%

+37.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-56.84%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.67%

-80.09%

+22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-31.58%

+29.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.59%

-75.53%

+54.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.48%

20.72%

+1.76%

Volatility

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) is 14.43%, while Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) has a volatility of 24.82%. This indicates that 3QQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3QQQ.LQQQ5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

24.82%

-10.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.36%

58.83%

-25.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.01%

79.70%

-16.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.47%

106.00%

-42.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.47%

106.00%

-42.53%

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

3QQQ.L vs. QQQ5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3QQQ.L nor QQQ5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ5.L.

3QQQ.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ5.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.01% for 3QQQ.L and 0.75% for QQQ5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3QQQ.L and QQQ5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer