PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3QQQ.L is traded in USD, while GOOO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GOOO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3QQQ.L achieves a 55.20% return, which is significantly higher than GOOO.L's 9.54% return.


3QQQ.L

1D
-1.99%
1M
21.40%
YTD
55.20%
6M
47.13%
1Y
115.72%
3Y*
56.07%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOO.L

1D
3.19%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
9.54%
6M
9.22%
1Y
76.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
55.20%13.90%21.01%
GOOO.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP
9.55%45.40%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and GOOO.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.50

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and GOOO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOO.L
GOOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3QQQ.LGOOO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.50

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

15.52

-10.20

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3QQQ.L and GOOO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3QQQ.LGOOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.10

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.72

-1.14

Drawdowns

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, which is greater than GOOO.L's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and GOOO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3QQQ.LGOOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.93%

-26.78%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

-16.93%

-30.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-7.56%

+5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.59%

-6.17%

-14.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.48%

4.92%

+17.56%

Volatility

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) at 7.76%. This indicates that 3QQQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3QQQ.LGOOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

7.76%

+6.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.36%

16.17%

+17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.01%

24.55%

+38.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.47%

25.85%

+37.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.47%

25.85%

+37.62%

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3QQQ.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison

3QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.21%.


PositionTTM20252024
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOO.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP
22.21%11.49%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


3QQQ.L and GOOO.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GOOO.L.

3QQQ.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GOOO.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.01% for 3QQQ.L and 0.55% for GOOO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3QQQ.L and GOOO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer