3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L).

3QQQ.L and 3VT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3QQQ.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 6, 2022. 3VT.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021.

Performance

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
3QQQ.L Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities	-19.09%	13.90%	60.92%	187.21%	-56.66%
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP	-8.51%	38.29%	30.18%	50.74%	-30.63%

Different Trading Currencies

3QQQ.L is traded in USD, while 3VT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3VT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3QQQ.L achieves a -19.09% return, which is significantly lower than 3VT.L's -8.51% return.

3QQQ.L

• 1D: 8.72%
• 1M: -10.76%
• YTD: -19.09%
• 6M: -16.94%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: 38.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3VT.L

• 1D: 8.89%
• 1M: -13.84%
• YTD: -8.51%
• 6M: -4.22%
• 1Y: 40.24%
• 3Y*: 28.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than 3VT.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

3VT.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP

3QQQ.L

Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities

Return for Risk

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3QQQ.L

3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

3VT.L

3VT.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
3VT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
3VT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
3VT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
3VT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
3VT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3QQQ.L	3VT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.84	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.34	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	1.36	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	5.05	-3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the 3VT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3QQQ.L and 3VT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3QQQ.L	3VT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	0.84	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.07	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between 3QQQ.L and 3VT.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3QQQ.L nor 3VT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, smaller than the maximum 3VT.L drawdown of -66.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and 3VT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3QQQ.L	3VT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.93%	-58.87%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.89%	-32.15%	-15.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.24%	-18.90%	-23.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.85%	-26.09%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.13%	7.19%	+13.94%

Volatility

3QQQ.L vs. 3VT.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) have volatilities of 16.78% and 16.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3QQQ.L	3VT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.78%	16.53%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.33%	29.57%	+23.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.29%	47.91%	+22.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.86%	51.74%	+12.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.86%	51.74%	+12.12%