3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L
3QQQ.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities) and 2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3QQQ.L is actively managed, while 2FB.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3QQQ.L returned 56.07%/yr vs 41.96%/yr for 2FB.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 3QQQ.L charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 2FB.L.
Performance
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3QQQ.L is traded in USD, while 2FB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2FB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3QQQ.L achieves a 55.20% return, which is significantly higher than 2FB.L's -16.62% return.
3QQQ.L
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 26.97%
- YTD
- 55.20%
- 6M
- 49.56%
- 1Y
- 119.94%
- 3Y*
- 56.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L
- 1D
- 7.17%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- -16.62%
- 6M
- -17.19%
- 1Y
- -29.08%
- 3Y*
- 41.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3QQQ.L Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities | 55.20% | 13.90% | 60.92% | 187.21% | -56.66% |
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -16.62% | -1.67% | 124.76% | 633.92% | -70.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3QQQ.L and 2FB.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between 3QQQ.L and 2FB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L — Risk / Return Rank
3QQQ.L
2FB.L
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3QQQ.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.97 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | -0.48 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | -0.88 | +6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3QQQ.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | -0.43 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.07 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -58.93%, smaller than the maximum 2FB.L drawdown of -96.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3QQQ.L and 2FB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3QQQ.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.93% | -96.82% | +37.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.89% | -60.88% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.67% | -61.85% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -46.38% | +44.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -40.77% | +20.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.48% | 32.83% | -10.35% |
Volatility
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) have volatilities of 14.43% and 14.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3QQQ.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.43% | 14.46% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.36% | 51.51% | -18.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.01% | 67.39% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.47% | 84.51% | -21.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.47% | 79.32% | -15.85% |
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3QQQ.L has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than 2FB.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
3QQQ.L vs. 2FB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3QQQ.L nor 2FB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3QQQ.L and 2FB.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2FB.L.
Their fees differ too: 0.01% for 3QQQ.L and 0.75% for 2FB.L.
Find the right allocation for 3QQQ.L and 2FB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer