3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

3NGS.L (WisdomTree Natural Gas 3x Daily Short) and PHSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - 3NGS.L is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Natural Gas Commodity Futures SL Index, while PHSP.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3NGS.L returned -57.37%/yr vs 14.85%/yr for PHSP.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. 3NGS.L charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PHSP.L.

Performance

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Natural Gas 3x Daily Short (3NGS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3NGS.L is traded in USD, while PHSP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHSP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3NGS.L achieves a -44.45% return, which is significantly lower than PHSP.L's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, 3NGS.L has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of -57.37%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.85% annualized return.

3NGS.L

• 1D: 9.19%
• 1M: -27.93%
• YTD: -44.45%
• 6M: 17.27%
• 1Y: -18.09%
• 3Y*: -36.19%
• 5Y*: -70.26%
• 10Y*: -57.37%

PHSP.L

• 1D: -6.94%
• 1M: -11.26%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 6M: 17.46%
• 1Y: 91.46%
• 3Y*: 42.20%
• 5Y*: 19.22%
• 10Y*: 14.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
3NGS.L WisdomTree Natural Gas 3x Daily Short	-44.45%	-49.90%	-33.02%	400.38%	-98.64%	-91.94%	-7.20%	59.70%	-77.54%	97.63%
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver	-4.41%	147.01%	20.80%	-1.58%	3.15%	-12.90%	45.17%	17.09%	-9.01%	3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 3NGS.L and PHSP.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2012	-0.00

Return for Risk

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3NGS.L

3NGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
3NGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
3NGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
3NGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
3NGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
3NGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

PHSP.L

PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 50
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Natural Gas 3x Daily Short (3NGS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3NGS.L	PHSP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	1.63	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	2.04	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.31	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	2.23	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	4.81	-5.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3NGS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3NGS.L and PHSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3NGS.L	PHSP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	1.63	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	0.51	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.39	0.46	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.08	-0.43

Drawdowns

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3NGS.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than PHSP.L's maximum drawdown of -77.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3NGS.L and PHSP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3NGS.L	PHSP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-77.00%	-23.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.50%	-40.88%	-37.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.96%	-40.88%	-54.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.92%	-40.88%	-59.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	-43.76%	-56.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-40.02%	-59.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.61%	-52.76%	-31.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.26%	18.96%	+24.30%

Volatility

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Natural Gas 3x Daily Short (3NGS.L) has a higher volatility of 35.90% compared to WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) at 17.65%. This indicates that 3NGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3NGS.L	PHSP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.90%	17.65%	+18.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	128.43%	53.19%	+75.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.82%	55.90%	+95.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.29%	37.92%	+130.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.02%	32.24%	+115.78%

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3NGS.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PHSP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

3NGS.L vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3NGS.L nor PHSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3NGS.L and PHSP.L in my portfolio?

3NGS.L and PHSP.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3NGS.L or PHSP.L?

On fees, PHSP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3NGS.L or PHSP.L?

PHSP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for 3NGS.L.

What is the main difference between 3NGS.L and PHSP.L?

3NGS.L is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while PHSP.L is Silver. 3NGS.L tracks Solactive Natural Gas Commodity Futures SL Index, while PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for 3NGS.L and 0.49% for PHSP.L.