PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3NFE.L is traded in EUR, while AMD3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMD3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3NFE.L achieves a -45.74% return, which is significantly lower than AMD3.L's 625.20% return.


3NFE.L

1D
2.63%
1M
-20.34%
YTD
-45.74%
6M
-60.00%
1Y
-82.47%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
-47.15%
10Y*

AMD3.L

1D
-6.42%
1M
179.08%
YTD
625.20%
6M
559.39%
1Y
2,144.12%
3Y*
50.48%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3NFE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR
-45.74%-42.85%343.40%211.89%-99.47%75.15%
AMD3.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities
625.20%45.61%-75.24%462.70%-97.39%392.64%

Correlation

The correlation between 3NFE.L and AMD3.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between 3NFE.L and AMD3.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3NFE.L
AMD3.L

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

3NFE.L
100.0%
AMD3.L

-

Basic Materials

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Energy

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Financial Services

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Healthcare

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Industrials

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Real Estate

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Technology

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L
100.0%

Utilities

3NFE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3NFE.L
3NFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
3NFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3NFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
3NFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
3NFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3NFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD3.L
AMD3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3NFE.LAMD3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.60

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

27.82

-28.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

51.37

-52.76

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3NFE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3NFE.L and AMD3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3NFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

11.15

-12.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.06

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.09

-0.43

Drawdowns

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3NFE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum AMD3.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3NFE.L and AMD3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3NFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-99.50%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.42%

-76.09%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.42%

-97.92%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.86%

-99.50%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.45%

-73.61%

-24.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.10%

-83.31%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.67%

41.28%

+18.39%

Volatility

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities EUR (3NFE.L) is 22.67%, while Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) has a volatility of 69.99%. This indicates that 3NFE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3NFE.LAMD3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.67%

69.99%

-47.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.25%

134.79%

-56.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.74%

189.90%

-94.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.78%

156.74%

-31.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.69%

156.31%

-33.62%

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3NFE.L and AMD3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3NFE.L vs. AMD3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3NFE.L nor AMD3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3NFE.L and AMD3.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3NFE.L and AMD3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3NFE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NFLX Index, while AMD3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3NFE.L and AMD3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer