3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L
3KOR.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities) and MAG7.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3KOR.L is actively managed, while MAG7.L is passively managed. Over the past year, 3KOR.L returned 1566.06% vs 126.01% for MAG7.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3KOR.L achieves a 432.95% return, which is significantly higher than MAG7.L's -0.37% return.
3KOR.L
- 1D
- -13.87%
- 1M
- 39.61%
- YTD
- 432.95%
- 6M
- 564.02%
- 1Y
- 1,566.06%
- 3Y*
- 102.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAG7.L
- 1D
- 5.22%
- 1M
- 13.25%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 126.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities | 432.95% | 356.68% | -63.38% |
MAG7.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities | -0.37% | -28.43% | 150.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3KOR.L and MAG7.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L — Risk / Return Rank
3KOR.L
MAG7.L
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3KOR.L | MAG7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.24 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.76 | 1.75 | +24.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 79.33 | 4.33 | +75.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3KOR.L | MAG7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65 | 1.28 | +11.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.24 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3KOR.L drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, smaller than the maximum MAG7.L drawdown of -91.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3KOR.L and MAG7.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3KOR.L | MAG7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.50% | -91.14% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -71.56% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.12% | -45.38% | +29.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.83% | -47.28% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.55% | 28.97% | -9.42% |
Volatility
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a higher volatility of 54.37% compared to Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) at 27.50%. This indicates that 3KOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAG7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3KOR.L | MAG7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 54.37% | 27.50% | +26.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 98.72% | 71.68% | +27.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.51% | 97.62% | +24.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.56% | 124.75% | -38.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.56% | 124.75% | -38.19% |
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3KOR.L and MAG7.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3KOR.L vs. MAG7.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3KOR.L nor MAG7.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3KOR.L and MAG7.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3KOR.L and MAG7.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3KOR.L and MAG7.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer