3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L
3KOR.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities) and GLDI.L (IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3KOR.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while GLDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, 3KOR.L returned 1566.06% vs 26.77% for GLDI.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3KOR.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GLDI.L.
Performance
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3KOR.L achieves a 432.95% return, which is significantly higher than GLDI.L's -0.81% return.
3KOR.L
- 1D
- -13.87%
- 1M
- 39.61%
- YTD
- 432.95%
- 6M
- 564.02%
- 1Y
- 1,566.06%
- 3Y*
- 102.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities | 432.95% | 356.68% | -55.63% |
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | -0.81% | 61.04% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3KOR.L and GLDI.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3KOR.L
GLDI.L
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3KOR.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.24 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.76 | 1.62 | +24.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 79.33 | 4.13 | +75.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3KOR.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65 | 1.23 | +11.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.74 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3KOR.L drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, which is greater than GLDI.L's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3KOR.L and GLDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3KOR.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.50% | -16.47% | -69.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -16.47% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.12% | -15.11% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.83% | -3.38% | -49.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.55% | 6.46% | +13.09% |
Volatility
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a higher volatility of 54.37% compared to IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that 3KOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3KOR.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 54.37% | 4.55% | +49.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 98.72% | 18.56% | +80.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.51% | 21.67% | +100.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.56% | 18.78% | +67.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.56% | 18.78% | +67.78% |
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3KOR.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
3KOR.L vs. GLDI.L - Dividend Comparison
3KOR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | 12.75% | 9.15% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3KOR.L and GLDI.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3KOR.L.
3KOR.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLDI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3KOR.L and 0.35% for GLDI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3KOR.L and GLDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer