3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3KOR.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities) and 3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3KOR.L is actively managed, while 3TSM.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3KOR.L returned 102.71%/yr vs 150.80%/yr for 3TSM.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3KOR.L achieves a 432.95% return, which is significantly higher than 3TSM.L's 149.88% return.

3KOR.L

• 1D: -13.87%
• 1M: 39.61%
• YTD: 432.95%
• 6M: 564.02%
• 1Y: 1,566.06%
• 3Y*: 102.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3TSM.L

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 41.02%
• YTD: 149.88%
• 6M: 166.79%
• 1Y: 543.00%
• 3Y*: 150.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities	432.95%	356.68%	-62.34%	15.02%	-56.31%
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities	149.88%	60.55%	288.94%	90.51%	-63.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022	0.49

The correlation between 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3KOR.L	3TSM.L
Technology	52.3%	100.0%
Industrials	20.4%	-
Financial Services	9.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	-
Healthcare	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Utilities	0.4%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3KOR.L

3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

3TSM.L

3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3KOR.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.65	5.12	+7.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.05	3.88	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.44	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.76	11.56	+14.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	79.33	33.54	+45.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.65, which is higher than the 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3KOR.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65	5.12	+7.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.36	+0.18

Drawdowns

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3KOR.L drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, smaller than the maximum 3TSM.L drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3KOR.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.50%	-93.59%	+8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.08%	-46.56%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.11%	-81.95%	+5.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.12%	0.00%	-16.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-55.66%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.55%	16.08%	+3.47%

Volatility

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a higher volatility of 54.37% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) at 37.09%. This indicates that 3KOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3TSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3KOR.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	54.37%	37.09%	+17.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.72%	77.74%	+20.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	122.51%	105.51%	+17.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.56%	114.35%	-27.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.56%	114.35%	-27.79%

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3KOR.L vs. 3TSM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3KOR.L nor 3TSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3KOR.L and 3TSM.L in my portfolio?

3KOR.L and 3TSM.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3KOR.L or 3TSM.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3KOR.L or 3TSM.L?

3KOR.L and 3TSM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.