PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Gold 3x Daily Leveraged (3GOL.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOL.L achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than DGRA.L's 6.76% return.


3GOL.L

1D
1.95%
1M
-8.73%
YTD
-10.37%
6M
-6.64%
1Y
59.63%
3Y*
72.05%
5Y*
34.18%
10Y*
21.65%

DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.76%
6M
6.13%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3GOL.L
WisdomTree Gold 3x Daily Leveraged
-10.37%236.16%60.53%20.26%-13.87%-20.96%51.59%45.43%-12.42%25.08%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
6.76%13.09%18.23%18.70%-8.32%25.27%12.58%28.83%-6.56%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOL.L and DGRA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.04

Over the past year, 3GOL.L and DGRA.L have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOL.L
3GOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
3GOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold 3x Daily Leveraged (3GOL.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOL.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.63

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

10.40

-7.79

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOL.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOL.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.84

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.91

-0.81

Drawdowns

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOL.L drawdown since its inception was -83.64%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOL.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOL.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.64%

-31.66%

-51.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.91%

-7.54%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.91%

-16.17%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.46%

-17.94%

-37.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.95%

-0.04%

-49.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.53%

-3.54%

-56.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.77%

1.91%

+20.86%

Volatility

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Gold 3x Daily Leveraged (3GOL.L) has a higher volatility of 19.22% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 2.43%. This indicates that 3GOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOL.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.22%

2.43%

+16.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.56%

7.67%

+58.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.17%

10.75%

+64.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.72%

14.10%

+38.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.73%

14.92%

+33.81%

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GOL.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

3GOL.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOL.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOL.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for 3GOL.L.

3GOL.L is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. 3GOL.L tracks Solactive Gold Commodity Futures SL Index (300%), while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for 3GOL.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOL.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer