3FB.L vs. 3BID.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3FB.L (Leverage Shares 3x Facebook ETC GBP) and 3BID.L (Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3FB.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X FB Index while 3BID.L tracks the Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3FB.L returned 32.30%/yr vs -52.39%/yr for 3BID.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Facebook ETC GBP (3FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3FB.L achieves a -32.02% return, which is significantly lower than 3BID.L's -29.92% return.

3FB.L

• 1D: 11.21%
• 1M: 14.30%
• YTD: -32.02%
• 6M: -33.99%
• 1Y: -51.73%
• 3Y*: 32.30%
• 5Y*: -31.83%
• 10Y*: —

3BID.L

• 1D: -5.04%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: -29.92%
• 6M: -6.51%
• 1Y: 63.77%
• 3Y*: -52.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3FB.L Leverage Shares 3x Facebook ETC GBP	-32.02%	-29.04%	176.41%	1,413.26%	-99.33%	-2.20%
3BID.L Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP	-29.92%	54.89%	-80.82%	-49.94%	-88.69%	-61.82%

Correlation

The correlation between 3FB.L and 3BID.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.28

The correlation between 3FB.L and 3BID.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3FB.L	3BID.L
Communication Services	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3FB.L

3FB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
3FB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3FB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
3FB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
3FB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
3FB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

3BID.L

3BID.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
3BID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
3BID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
3BID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
3BID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
3BID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Facebook ETC GBP (3FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3FB.L	3BID.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	0.46	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	1.68	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.19	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	0.85	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	1.49	-2.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3FB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the 3BID.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3FB.L and 3BID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3FB.L	3BID.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	0.46	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	-0.45	+0.23

Drawdowns

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3FB.L drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BID.L drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3FB.L and 3BID.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3FB.L	3BID.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.77%	-99.84%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.00%	-74.41%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.94%	-96.25%	+13.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.96%	-99.68%	+8.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.45%	-91.43%	+16.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.72%	42.73%	+3.99%

Volatility

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Facebook ETC GBP (3FB.L) is 21.78%, while Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) has a volatility of 55.32%. This indicates that 3FB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3FB.L	3BID.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.78%	55.32%	-33.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.08%	100.16%	-22.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.83%	139.35%	-38.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.34%	147.39%	-21.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.55%	147.39%	-23.84%

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3FB.L and 3BID.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3FB.L vs. 3BID.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3FB.L nor 3BID.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3FB.L and 3BID.L in my portfolio?

3FB.L and 3BID.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3FB.L or 3BID.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3FB.L or 3BID.L?

3FB.L and 3BID.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 3FB.L and 3BID.L?

3FB.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X FB Index, while 3BID.L tracks Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index.