PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR (3CRE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3CRE.L is traded in EUR, while AMD3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMD3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3CRE.L achieves a -73.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMD3.L's 625.20% return.


3CRE.L

1D
-2.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-73.52%
6M
-67.56%
1Y
-79.47%
3Y*
-47.78%
5Y*
-48.66%
10Y*

AMD3.L

1D
-6.42%
1M
179.08%
YTD
625.20%
6M
559.39%
1Y
2,144.12%
3Y*
50.48%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3CRE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR
-73.52%-73.38%21.60%452.79%-93.59%47.45%
AMD3.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities
625.20%45.61%-75.24%462.70%-97.39%392.64%

Correlation

The correlation between 3CRE.L and AMD3.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between 3CRE.L and AMD3.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3CRE.L
AMD3.L

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

3CRE.L
100.0%
AMD3.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Communication Services

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Energy

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Financial Services

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Healthcare

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Industrials

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Real Estate

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Utilities

3CRE.L

-

AMD3.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3CRE.L
3CRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
3CRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3CRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
3CRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
3CRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3CRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD3.L
AMD3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR (3CRE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3CRE.LAMD3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.60

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

27.82

-28.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

51.37

-52.83

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3CRE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the AMD3.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3CRE.L and AMD3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3CRE.LAMD3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

11.15

-11.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.06

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

0.09

-0.58

Drawdowns

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3CRE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.84%, roughly equal to the maximum AMD3.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CRE.L and AMD3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3CRE.LAMD3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.84%

-99.50%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.64%

-76.09%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.31%

-97.92%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.84%

-99.50%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.38%

-73.61%

-24.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.27%

-83.31%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.41%

41.28%

+13.13%

Volatility

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR (3CRE.L) is 49.95%, while Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETP Securities (AMD3.L) has a volatility of 69.99%. This indicates that 3CRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3CRE.LAMD3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.95%

69.99%

-20.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.94%

134.79%

-34.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.75%

189.90%

-77.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.88%

156.74%

-44.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.42%

156.31%

-44.89%

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3CRE.L and AMD3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3CRE.L vs. AMD3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3CRE.L nor AMD3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3CRE.L and AMD3.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3CRE.L and AMD3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3CRE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X CRM Index, while AMD3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3CRE.L and AMD3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer