PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BID.L vs. TSLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3BID.L is traded in GBp, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BID.L achieves a -29.92% return, which is significantly lower than TSLI.L's -9.32% return.


3BID.L

1D
-5.04%
1M
4.03%
YTD
-29.92%
6M
-6.51%
1Y
63.77%
3Y*
-52.39%
5Y*
10Y*

TSLI.L

1D
-3.56%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-9.32%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
48.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3BID.L
Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP
-29.92%54.89%-37.48%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-9.32%30.51%31.84%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BID.L and TSLI.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BID.L
3BID.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
3BID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
3BID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3BID.LTSLI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

1.95

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

4.87

-3.39

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BID.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BID.L and TSLI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3BID.LTSLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.29

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.65

-1.10

Drawdowns

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BID.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BID.L and TSLI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3BID.LTSLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-43.88%

-55.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.41%

-24.61%

-49.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.68%

-15.06%

-84.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.43%

-13.75%

-77.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.73%

9.87%

+32.86%

Volatility

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) has a higher volatility of 55.32% compared to IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) at 12.13%. This indicates that 3BID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3BID.LTSLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.32%

12.13%

+43.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.16%

25.23%

+74.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.35%

37.48%

+101.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

147.39%

43.01%

+104.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

147.39%

43.01%

+104.38%

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3BID.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3BID.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison

3BID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%.


PositionTTM20252024
3BID.L
Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
74.25%73.68%19.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


3BID.L and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3BID.L.

3BID.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3BID.L and 0.55% for TSLI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3BID.L and TSLI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer