3BID.L vs. TLTI.L
3BID.L (Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP) and TLTI.L (IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3BID.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index, while TLTI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3BID.L is passively managed, while TLTI.L is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. 3BID.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TLTI.L.
Performance
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3BID.L is traded in GBp, while TLTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLTI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3BID.L achieves a -29.92% return, which is significantly lower than TLTI.L's -4.62% return.
3BID.L
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- -29.92%
- 6M
- -6.51%
- 1Y
- 63.77%
- 3Y*
- -52.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTI.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- -4.62%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3BID.L Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP | -29.92% | 138.01% |
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP | -4.62% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3BID.L and TLTI.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3BID.L
TLTI.L
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3BID.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3BID.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.26 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3BID.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than TLTI.L's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BID.L and TLTI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3BID.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -14.19% | -85.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.68% | -12.65% | -87.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -6.59% | -84.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.73% | — | — |
Volatility
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3BID.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.35% | 13.42% | +125.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.39% | 13.42% | +133.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.39% | 13.42% | +133.97% |
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3BID.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3BID.L vs. TLTI.L - Dividend Comparison
3BID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
3BID.L Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP | 0.11% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3BID.L and TLTI.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3BID.L.
3BID.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TLTI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3BID.L and 0.55% for TLTI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3BID.L and TLTI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer