3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L
3BID.L (Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP) and 3AMD.L (Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3BID.L tracks the Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index while 3AMD.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3BID.L returned -52.39%/yr vs 50.58%/yr for 3AMD.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3BID.L achieves a -29.92% return, which is significantly lower than 3AMD.L's 618.51% return.
3BID.L
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- -29.92%
- 6M
- -6.51%
- 1Y
- 63.77%
- 3Y*
- -52.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AMD.L
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- 179.82%
- YTD
- 618.51%
- 6M
- 551.86%
- 1Y
- 2,205.70%
- 3Y*
- 50.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3BID.L Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP | -29.92% | 54.89% | -80.82% | -49.94% | -88.69% | -67.14% |
3AMD.L Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP | 618.51% | 53.77% | -76.38% | 448.82% | -97.41% | 265.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3BID.L and 3AMD.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
3BID.L
3AMD.L
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3BID.L | 3AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.60 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 28.52 | -27.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 52.70 | -51.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3BID.L | 3AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 11.54 | -11.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.04 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3BID.L drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum 3AMD.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BID.L and 3AMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3BID.L | 3AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -99.50% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.41% | -76.34% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.25% | -97.93% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.68% | -72.82% | -26.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -84.93% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.73% | 41.40% | +1.33% |
Volatility
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Baidu ETC GBP (3BID.L) is 55.32%, while Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a volatility of 69.06%. This indicates that 3BID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3BID.L | 3AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.32% | 69.06% | -13.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.16% | 134.49% | -34.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.35% | 188.70% | -49.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.39% | 158.29% | -10.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.39% | 158.29% | -10.90% |
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3BID.L and 3AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3BID.L vs. 3AMD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3BID.L nor 3AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3BID.L and 3AMD.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3BID.L and 3AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3BID.L tracks Solactive Leveraged 3x BIDU Index, while 3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index.
Find the right allocation for 3BID.L and 3AMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer