PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (LUK2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BAL.L achieves a 25.99% return, which is significantly higher than LUK2.L's 12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, 3BAL.L has outperformed LUK2.L with an annualized return of 18.00%, while LUK2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.


3BAL.L

1D
-4.44%
1M
-2.06%
6M
16.39%
YTD
25.99%
1Y
159.56%
3Y*
137.08%
5Y*
79.57%
10Y*
18.00%

LUK2.L

1D
0.67%
1M
1.34%
6M
6.53%
YTD
12.85%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
25.99%433.07%68.07%63.85%-24.90%108.27%-79.89%25.77%-70.96%15.80%
LUK2.L
L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)
12.85%43.73%9.81%6.59%3.75%34.76%-30.43%32.52%-20.70%22.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BAL.L and LUK2.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014

0.58

The correlation between 3BAL.L and LUK2.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LUK2.L
LUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (LUK2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3BAL.LLUK2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

1.94

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

5.67

+3.72

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the LUK2.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BAL.L and LUK2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BAL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.29%, which is greater than LUK2.L's maximum drawdown of -58.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BAL.L and LUK2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3BAL.LLUK2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.29%

-58.84%

-40.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.44%

-18.55%

-26.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.31%

-25.42%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.94%

-25.42%

-52.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.78%

-58.84%

-38.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.30%

-6.16%

-41.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-10.67%

-71.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.93%

6.34%

+10.59%

Volatility

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) has a higher volatility of 16.99% compared to L&G FTSE 100 Leveraged (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (LUK2.L) at 5.83%. This indicates that 3BAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUK2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3BAL.LLUK2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.99%

5.83%

+11.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.11%

19.66%

+37.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.89%

22.62%

+46.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.78%

25.60%

+49.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.40%

29.65%

+52.75%

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3BAL.L has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LUK2.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

3BAL.L vs. LUK2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BAL.L nor LUK2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3BAL.L and LUK2.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LUK2.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index, while LUK2.L tracks FTSE 100 Daily Leveraged Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for 3BAL.L and 0.50% for LUK2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3BAL.L and LUK2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer