PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BAL.L achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than 3AAP.L's 29.86% return.


3BAL.L

1D
-4.27%
1M
14.54%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
16.46%
1Y
116.19%
3Y*
133.01%
5Y*
59.71%
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
34.96%
YTD
29.86%
6M
16.84%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
-1.51%433.07%68.07%63.85%-24.90%108.27%14.99%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.86%-28.23%70.02%151.70%-73.70%95.43%218.42%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BAL.L and 3AAP.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3BAL.L3AAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.64

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

7.15

-0.53

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BAL.L and 3AAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3BAL.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.28

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.41

-0.32

Drawdowns

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BAL.L drawdown since its inception was -97.78%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BAL.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3BAL.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.78%

-75.66%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.44%

-44.36%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.31%

-73.42%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.94%

-75.66%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.68%

-9.32%

-9.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.25%

-34.84%

-31.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.77%

22.63%

-5.86%

Volatility

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 15.65%. This indicates that 3BAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3BAL.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.85%

15.65%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.46%

49.09%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.79%

98.77%

-29.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.94%

86.95%

-12.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.85%

88.95%

-6.10%

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3BAL.L has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than 3AAP.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

3BAL.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BAL.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3BAL.L and 3AAP.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3AAP.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AAP.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index, while 3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for 3BAL.L and 0.75% for 3AAP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3BAL.L and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer