3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L
3ARE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR) and 3CRE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3ARE.L is actively managed, while 3CRE.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3ARE.L returned 0.56%/yr vs -47.78%/yr for 3CRE.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3ARE.L achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly higher than 3CRE.L's -73.52% return.
3ARE.L
- 1D
- 10.69%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- -10.77%
- 6M
- -25.83%
- 1Y
- 51.44%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3CRE.L
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -73.52%
- 6M
- -67.56%
- 1Y
- -79.47%
- 3Y*
- -47.78%
- 5Y*
- -48.66%
- 10Y*
- —
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3ARE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR | -10.77% | -2.23% | -24.41% | 184.23% | -99.25% | 8.85% |
3CRE.L Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR | -73.52% | -73.38% | 21.60% | 452.79% | -93.59% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3ARE.L and 3CRE.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between 3ARE.L and 3CRE.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
Healthcare
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
-
Technology
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
Financial Services
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
-
Communication Services
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
-
Industrials
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
-
Basic Materials
3ARE.L
-
3CRE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
3ARE.L
-
3CRE.L
-
Energy
3ARE.L
-
3CRE.L
-
Real Estate
3ARE.L
-
3CRE.L
-
Utilities
3ARE.L
-
3CRE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L — Risk / Return Rank
3ARE.L
3CRE.L
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR (3CRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3ARE.L | 3CRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | -0.92 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | -1.46 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3ARE.L | 3CRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | -0.70 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.50 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3ARE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, roughly equal to the maximum 3CRE.L drawdown of -98.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ARE.L and 3CRE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3ARE.L | 3CRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.62% | -98.84% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.63% | -86.64% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.57% | -96.31% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -98.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.68% | -98.38% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.64% | -80.27% | -15.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.09% | 54.41% | -12.32% |
Volatility
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) is 27.63%, while Leverage Shares 3x Salesforce.Com ETP Securities EUR (3CRE.L) has a volatility of 49.95%. This indicates that 3ARE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3CRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3ARE.L | 3CRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.63% | 49.95% | -22.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.98% | 99.94% | -31.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 99.36% | 112.75% | -13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 131.55% | 111.88% | +19.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 131.55% | 111.42% | +20.13% |
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3ARE.L and 3CRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3ARE.L vs. 3CRE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3ARE.L nor 3CRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3ARE.L and 3CRE.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3ARE.L and 3CRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3ARE.L and 3CRE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer