PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ARE.L achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly higher than 2BRE.L's -13.89% return.


3ARE.L

1D
10.69%
1M
11.54%
YTD
-10.77%
6M
-25.83%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
10Y*

2BRE.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.34%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3ARE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR
-10.77%-2.23%-24.41%184.23%-99.25%7.89%
2BRE.L
Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR
-13.89%-4.91%55.13%18.25%4.42%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.15

The correlation between 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ARE.L
3ARE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

2BRE.L
2BRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ARE.L2BRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.91

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.82

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

-1.60

+2.82

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the 2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ARE.L2BRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.66

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.30

-0.77

Drawdowns

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ARE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, which is greater than 2BRE.L's maximum drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ARE.L2BRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.62%

-40.62%

-59.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.63%

-22.65%

-50.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.57%

-39.67%

-42.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.68%

-37.26%

-61.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.64%

-19.10%

-76.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.09%

11.62%

+30.47%

Volatility

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) has a higher volatility of 27.63% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L) at 7.24%. This indicates that 3ARE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2BRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ARE.L2BRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.63%

7.24%

+20.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.98%

20.36%

+47.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.36%

28.18%

+71.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.55%

37.23%

+94.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.55%

37.23%

+94.32%

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ARE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ARE.L nor 2BRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ARE.L and 2BRE.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ARE.L and 2BRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ARE.L and 2BRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer