PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3APE.L is traded in EUR, while 3AAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3AAP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 3APE.L having a 31.29% return and 3AAP.L slightly lower at 31.02%.


3APE.L

1D
-1.27%
1M
34.25%
YTD
31.29%
6M
18.06%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
24.88%
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
34.71%
YTD
31.02%
6M
18.02%
1Y
155.64%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
23.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
31.29%-31.84%78.10%157.67%-74.17%96.79%77.55%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
31.02%-31.98%78.22%157.03%-75.09%108.44%74.74%

Correlation

The correlation between 3APE.L and 3AAP.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.89

The correlation between 3APE.L and 3AAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3APE.L3AAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.49

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

6.86

+1.69

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3APE.L and 3AAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3APE.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.57

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.27

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.42

-0.11

Drawdowns

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3APE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, roughly equal to the maximum 3AAP.L drawdown of -76.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3APE.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3APE.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-76.83%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.29%

-44.31%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.89%

-74.34%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.86%

-76.83%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.02%

-13.15%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-35.72%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.13%

22.58%

-4.45%

Volatility

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) have volatilities of 15.15% and 15.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3APE.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

15.27%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.36%

48.85%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.52%

98.69%

-30.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.99%

87.46%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.29%

89.40%

-5.11%

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3APE.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3APE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3APE.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, 3APE.L and 3AAP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3APE.L and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Both ETFs track iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3APE.L and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer