3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L
3AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC) and NVDI.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3AMZ.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while NVDI.L is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3AMZ.L is passively managed, while NVDI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 3AMZ.L returned 22.78% vs 19.99% for NVDI.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3AMZ.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NVDI.L.
Performance
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3AMZ.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than NVDI.L's -0.43% return.
3AMZ.L
- 1D
- 5.83%
- 1M
- -23.12%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- -20.24%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | 10.09% | -38.43% | 37.78% |
NVDI.L IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP | -0.43% | 16.65% | -7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3AMZ.L and NVDI.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3AMZ.L
NVDI.L
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3AMZ.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.92 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 2.00 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3AMZ.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 0.62 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.11 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than NVDI.L's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMZ.L and NVDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3AMZ.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -31.39% | -65.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -21.59% | -38.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.82% | -9.62% | -72.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -10.27% | -59.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.01% | 9.98% | +19.03% |
Volatility
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) has a higher volatility of 28.35% compared to IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) at 10.09%. This indicates that 3AMZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3AMZ.L | NVDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.35% | 10.09% | +18.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.97% | 20.28% | +50.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.35% | 32.34% | +69.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.43% | 39.31% | +67.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.76% | 39.31% | +65.45% |
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3AMZ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3AMZ.L vs. NVDI.L - Dividend Comparison
3AMZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDI.L IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP | 20.63% | 32.04% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3AMZ.L and NVDI.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AMZ.L.
3AMZ.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDI.L is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AMZ.L and 0.55% for NVDI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3AMZ.L and NVDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer