3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L
3AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC) and GLDI.L (IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3AMZ.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while GLDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3AMZ.L is passively managed, while GLDI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 3AMZ.L returned 22.78% vs 26.77% for GLDI.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3AMZ.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GLDI.L.
Performance
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3AMZ.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than GLDI.L's -0.81% return.
3AMZ.L
- 1D
- 5.83%
- 1M
- -23.12%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.19%
- 5Y*
- -20.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | 10.09% | -38.43% | 37.78% |
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | -0.81% | 61.04% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3AMZ.L and GLDI.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3AMZ.L
GLDI.L
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) and IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3AMZ.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.62 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 4.13 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3AMZ.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.23 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 1.74 | -1.86 |
Drawdowns
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than GLDI.L's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMZ.L and GLDI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3AMZ.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -16.47% | -80.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -16.47% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.82% | -15.11% | -66.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.77% | -3.38% | -66.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.01% | 6.46% | +22.55% |
Volatility
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) has a higher volatility of 28.35% compared to IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that 3AMZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3AMZ.L | GLDI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.35% | 4.55% | +23.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.97% | 18.56% | +52.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.35% | 21.67% | +79.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.43% | 18.78% | +87.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.76% | 18.78% | +85.98% |
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3AMZ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
3AMZ.L vs. GLDI.L - Dividend Comparison
3AMZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLDI.L IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP | 12.75% | 9.15% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3AMZ.L and GLDI.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AMZ.L.
3AMZ.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLDI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AMZ.L and 0.35% for GLDI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3AMZ.L and GLDI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer