3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L
3AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC) and AVGI.L (IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3AMZ.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while AVGI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3AMZ.L is passively managed, while AVGI.L is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3AMZ.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AVGI.L.
Performance
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3AMZ.L achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than AVGI.L's 9.83% return.
3AMZ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -24.99%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 6M
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- -25.55%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | -6.58% | -8.59% |
AVGI.L IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP | 9.83% | 11,438.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3AMZ.L and AVGI.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3AMZ.L
AVGI.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3AMZ.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than AVGI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMZ.L and AVGI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3AMZ.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -43.06% | -53.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.57% | -28.20% | -56.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.67% | -22.16% | -47.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.07% | — | — |
Volatility
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3AMZ.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.43% | 10,070.47% | -9,967.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.19% | 10,070.47% | -9,966.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.15% | 10,070.47% | -9,968.32% |
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3AMZ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3AMZ.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison
3AMZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
3AMZ.L Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVGI.L IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP | 48.40% | 10.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3AMZ.L and AVGI.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AMZ.L.
3AMZ.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVGI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AMZ.L and 0.55% for AVGI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3AMZ.L and AVGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer