PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3AMZ.L is traded in USD, while 3BAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AMZ.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than 3BAL.L's -1.80% return.


3AMZ.L

1D
5.83%
1M
-23.12%
YTD
10.09%
6M
13.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
-20.24%
10Y*

3BAL.L

1D
-4.61%
1M
13.51%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
17.27%
1Y
114.02%
3Y*
138.90%
5Y*
58.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3AMZ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC
10.09%-38.43%110.82%268.28%-94.30%-10.77%70.75%
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
-1.80%473.30%65.27%72.49%-32.93%106.38%24.66%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.22

The correlation between 3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AMZ.L
3AMZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AMZ.L3BAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

2.33

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

6.24

-5.46

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AMZ.L3BAL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.56

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.75

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.10

-0.22

Drawdowns

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -97.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AMZ.L3BAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.67%

-97.97%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.08%

-46.85%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.75%

-51.40%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.31%

-80.76%

-15.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.82%

-20.34%

-61.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.77%

-67.67%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.01%

17.54%

+11.47%

Volatility

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) has a higher volatility of 28.35% compared to WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) at 19.40%. This indicates that 3AMZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3BAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AMZ.L3BAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.35%

19.40%

+8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.97%

55.76%

+15.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.35%

70.23%

+31.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.43%

77.29%

+29.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.76%

84.82%

+19.94%

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3AMZ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

3AMZ.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AMZ.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3AMZ.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AMZ.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

3AMZ.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AMZ.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AMZ.L and 3BAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer