PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AME.L vs. 3APE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AME.L achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than 3APE.L's 45.42% return.


3AME.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
6.13%
6M
0.37%
YTD
8.68%
1Y
-3.55%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
-25.72%
10Y*

3APE.L

1D
10.40%
1M
26.32%
6M
65.81%
YTD
45.42%
1Y
174.25%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3AME.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR
8.68%-41.30%120.76%275.32%-94.50%-6.26%71.17%
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
45.42%-31.84%78.10%157.67%-74.17%100.95%218.78%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AME.L and 3APE.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between 3AME.L and 3APE.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AME.L
3AME.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
3AME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
3AME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3AME.L3APE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

4.06

-4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

8.93

-9.04

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AME.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AME.L and 3APE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AME.L drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than 3APE.L's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AME.L and 3APE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AME.L3APE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.64%

-76.86%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.72%

-41.29%

-18.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.01%

-73.89%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.25%

-76.86%

-19.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.63%

-3.65%

-77.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.95%

-35.46%

-33.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.08%

18.76%

+12.32%

Volatility

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) have volatilities of 31.29% and 31.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AME.L3APE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.29%

31.01%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.56%

60.58%

+14.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.52%

78.32%

+17.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.86%

80.57%

+22.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.86%

83.30%

+17.56%

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AME.L and 3APE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AME.L vs. 3APE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AME.L nor 3APE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AME.L and 3APE.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AME.L and 3APE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AME.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while 3APE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AME.L and 3APE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer