PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AMD.L achieves a 345.21% return, which is significantly higher than DL2P.L's -4.61% return.


3AMD.L

1D
-12.57%
1M
-29.47%
6M
258.72%
YTD
345.21%
1Y
526.67%
3Y*
37.82%
5Y*
-2.85%
10Y*

DL2P.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.28%
6M
-9.64%
YTD
-4.61%
1Y
-5.87%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
13.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
345.21%53.76%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%341.88%
DL2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-4.61%44.27%25.79%31.85%-23.59%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AMD.L and DL2P.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DL2P.L
DL2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3AMD.LDL2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.99

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.84

-0.25

+7.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

-0.69

+13.11

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AMD.L and DL2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, which is greater than DL2P.L's maximum drawdown of -63.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMD.L and DL2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AMD.LDL2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-63.02%

-36.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.34%

-23.87%

-52.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.93%

-28.21%

-69.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

-46.63%

-52.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.16%

-10.68%

-72.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.19%

-16.32%

-66.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.13%

8.52%

+33.61%

Volatility

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 71.57% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) at 9.40%. This indicates that 3AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DL2P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AMD.LDL2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

71.57%

9.40%

+62.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

154.80%

26.51%

+128.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

201.90%

31.14%

+170.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.48%

33.70%

+128.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

161.04%

35.50%

+125.54%

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3AMD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DL2P.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

3AMD.L vs. DL2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AMD.L nor DL2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AMD.L and DL2P.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DL2P.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DL2P.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AMD.L.

3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index, while DL2P.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AMD.L and 0.40% for DL2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AMD.L and DL2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer