PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3ABN.L is traded in GBp, while MAGD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 3ABN.L having a -17.48% return and MAGD.L slightly higher at -16.64%.


3ABN.L

1D
7.63%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
-17.48%
6M
18.31%
1Y
-30.56%
3Y*
312.05%
5Y*
10Y*

MAGD.L

1D
0.97%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-16.64%
6M
-17.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 3ABN.L and MAGD.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ABN.LMAGD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ABN.LMAGD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

-0.28

+0.28

Drawdowns

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABN.L and MAGD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ABN.LMAGD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.20%

-28.32%

-70.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.50%

-25.32%

-14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.43%

-12.20%

-60.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.50%

Volatility

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ABN.LMAGD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.59%

22.15%

+63.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,929.19%

22.15%

+9,907.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,929.19%

22.15%

+9,907.04%

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3ABN.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

3ABN.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison

3ABN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


3ABN.L and MAGD.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3ABN.L.

3ABN.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MAGD.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3ABN.L and 0.45% for MAGD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ABN.L and MAGD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer