3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L
3ABN.L (Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP) and AVGI.L (IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3ABN.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index, while AVGI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3ABN.L is passively managed, while AVGI.L is actively managed. 3ABN.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AVGI.L.
Performance
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3ABN.L is traded in GBp, while AVGI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
3ABN.L
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -12.59%
- YTD
- -23.33%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- -38.24%
- 3Y*
- 265.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3ABN.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3ABN.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3ABN.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.75% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.53% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.40% | — | — |
Volatility
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3ABN.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.98% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,267,590.52% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,267,590.52% | — | — |
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3ABN.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3ABN.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3ABN.L nor AVGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3ABN.L.
3ABN.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVGI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3ABN.L and 0.55% for AVGI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3ABN.L and AVGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer