3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L
3ABN.L (Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP) and 3TSE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3ABN.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index while 3TSE.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3ABN.L returned 41.02%/yr vs -57.96%/yr for 3TSE.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3ABN.L is traded in GBp, while 3TSE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3TSE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3ABN.L achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly higher than 3TSE.L's -55.21% return.
3ABN.L
- 1D
- 4.96%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- -10.71%
- 3Y*
- 267.95%
- 5Y*
- 41.02%
- 10Y*
- —
3TSE.L
- 1D
- 7.80%
- 1M
- -37.23%
- YTD
- -55.21%
- 6M
- -63.26%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- -53.29%
- 5Y*
- -57.96%
- 10Y*
- —
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3ABN.L Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP | -3.36% | 12,759.06% | -45.96% | 65.33% | -95.15% | -22.60% |
3TSE.L Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR | -55.21% | -71.58% | 25.46% | 177.00% | -98.91% | 285.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3ABN.L
3TSE.L
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
3ABN.L
3TSE.L
Basic Materials
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Communication Services
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Energy
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Financial Services
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Healthcare
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Industrials
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Real Estate
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Technology
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Utilities
3ABN.L
-
3TSE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L — Risk / Return Rank
3ABN.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
3TSE.L
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3ABN.L | 3TSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.08 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.26 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.28 | -0.49 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3ABN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, roughly equal to the maximum 3TSE.L drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3ABN.L | 3TSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -99.84% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.74% | -72.04% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.81% | -95.73% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.81% | -99.84% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.69% | -99.75% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.65% | -86.65% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.53% | 38.57% | -0.04% |
Volatility
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) is 28.58%, while Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) has a volatility of 35.17%. This indicates that 3ABN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3TSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3ABN.L | 3TSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.58% | 35.17% | -6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.79% | 85.48% | -13.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.53% | 128.87% | -40.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,260,368.85% | 167.02% | +2,260,201.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,251,438.09% | 165.66% | +2,251,272.43% |
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3ABN.L nor 3TSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3ABN.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index, while 3TSE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index.
Find the right allocation for 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer