PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3ABN.L is traded in GBp, while 3TSE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3TSE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ABN.L achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly higher than 3TSE.L's -55.21% return.


3ABN.L

1D
4.96%
1M
24.01%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-2.80%
1Y
-10.71%
3Y*
267.95%
5Y*
41.02%
10Y*

3TSE.L

1D
7.80%
1M
-37.23%
YTD
-55.21%
6M
-63.26%
1Y
-18.91%
3Y*
-53.29%
5Y*
-57.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3ABN.L
Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP
-3.36%12,759.06%-45.96%65.33%-95.15%-22.60%
3TSE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR
-55.21%-71.58%25.46%177.00%-98.91%285.02%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.38

The correlation between 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3ABN.L
3TSE.L

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

3ABN.L
100.0%
3TSE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Communication Services

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Energy

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Financial Services

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Healthcare

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Industrials

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Real Estate

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Technology

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Utilities

3ABN.L

-

3TSE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ABN.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


3TSE.L
3TSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
3TSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3ABN.L3TSE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.26

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.28

-0.49

+0.21

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ABN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is comparable to the 3TSE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, roughly equal to the maximum 3TSE.L drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ABN.L3TSE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-99.84%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.74%

-72.04%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.81%

-95.73%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

-99.84%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.69%

-99.75%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.65%

-86.65%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.53%

38.57%

-0.04%

Volatility

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) is 28.58%, while Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities EUR (3TSE.L) has a volatility of 35.17%. This indicates that 3ABN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3TSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ABN.L3TSE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.58%

35.17%

-6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.79%

85.48%

-13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.53%

128.87%

-40.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2,260,368.85%

167.02%

+2,260,201.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,251,438.09%

165.66%

+2,251,272.43%

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ABN.L vs. 3TSE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ABN.L nor 3TSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ABN.L and 3TSE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3ABN.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index, while 3TSE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ABN.L and 3TSE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer